|
| |

"Max
continues to break old traditions in his search for ways to reach your maximum hitting and
pitching capabilities "
Max Ratofor, BS, MS,
Physiokinetist, Web Pilot and SETPRO consultant gives his "straight from the
hip" views and opinions on today's training issues. You can send your questions and
comments to maxrfd@ntplx.net |
| (Note from Max: After reading this posting, I realized I need to do a
discussion on the what momentum is and the difference between momentum and energy. It will
make reading the post more meaningful. This posting applies equally to both pitching
and hitting. Over the years I have learned as much about how pitchers develop power by
studying hitters and about pitching power from studying hitters. The kinetic chain applies
to both.) The hip controversy is
"never ending". In the best of Max on the Internet, I have taken people
to task (and I have been taken to task) on the issue of hip rotation. My comments have
generated controversy (under statement?). I will now attempt to give a more rigorous
explanation of my views.
"The term "hip rotation" is
in my opinion, a bad choice of terminology when compared to the actual actions of
the pelvis hip joint complex before, at and after foot plant (portion of the kinetic
pitching chain). The primary means of bodies transmitting momentum and power is through a series of linkages (chain) of joints and muscles. In the pitching forum, Alexj used the word
"torsion" to describe lower/upper body transfer . I like this word! To me it is more descriptive of what is
actually happening to the muscle-skeletal system. An example of torsion is two people
holding the opposite ends pipe or rod. If the pipe is made out of rigid material
and one person twists the pipe, the other immediately feels the torque with no rotation of
the pipe. If the pipe is made out of a
"springier" material, you still get some torque at the instant one end is
turned. How much depends on the "stiffness" of the material. In the first case
where its a very stiff material, both ends turn exactly with each other. In the second
case, there is a "twist" along he pipe (no one part/section of the pipe does all
of the turning, the turning is done by slight displacements along he entire length of he
pipe). Now if this material had the capability of when stretched, pulling back on its own
(like muscle), the twist would start at one end and in time work its way to he other
(twist would be completely taken out and position both ends would be the same). You can
also think of it as a row of "dominos" that have been set on end falling over
(the first domino transfers its momentum to he next domino which transfer to the next
which......).
I view "hip rotation" as two part
issue. Theres the "dynamic portion (torsion) and theres
the "static" portion (actual turning (rotation) of the hip (pelvis) around an imaginary rod perpendicular to the ground a passing through
the center of the pelvis which occurs after the hips have
linked with the upper body)). Dynamic means the motion that transfers momentum. The dynamic portion occurs before shoulder rotation begins.
Kinetic chain is the key to explaining how the body
develops power to throw and hit. Many of you have heard and know that power
starts with the feet. But how does power actually work its way from the feet to the hands.
The science to explain this is called the "kinetic chain". Dynamic transfer of
momentum (think of momentum in terms of how much force it takes to start and stop
and object) from one body part to the next is what the kinetic chain is all about. Just think of it as our dominos example, momentum goes
from feet to legs to hips to torso to shoulder to arms to hands to ball or bat. "Dynamic" rotation of the hips (shoulders not yet rotating) is
responsible for setting up the transfer of momentum to the upper body (shoulders).
The goal is to connect the linkage between
the hips and upper body at he instant of maximum hip rotational VELOCITY (this is
the basic goal of maximizing the effectiveness of the kinetic chain.
The exact timing and how much hips rotate is critical
to getting the most from your lower body to your upper body. That's why they call
it the kinetic chain. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. If your timing is
off, or the amount of movement is decreased (the more you can move something in he same
amount of time, the more momentum you develop) the less you transfer to the pitch or
swing.
Maximum velocity is not the same as maximum
displacement (movement)!!!!). Connecting at the instant of maximum velocity
transfers the most momentum. When the linkage is made between hips and upper parts of the
body, the upper torso starts to rotate. This displacement between hips and shoulders
(twist/torsion) develops muscle stretch which creates muscle length, plyometric response
and the storage of elastic energy.
It's the twist and not the
pull that generates most of the hip momentum. There is no major muscle group that
can "pull" the hip around at foot plant. What looks like pulling occurs as the
hip flexors pull the upper torso forwards twards the batter. The natural reaction of the
torso pulling forwards is to pull the back knee forwards. In one of my web postings
I said;
As far as power path of hips. My feelings are that once you establish foot plant,
there is little you can do to help the hips turn. Before everyone goes into orbit, try
this simple experiment. Take a stride so that you weight is 50/50 and hips are closed. Now
have someone stand behind you theirs hands on both of your hips trying to prevent you from
turning your hips. It takes very little force to stop your hips from turning no matter how
hard you try to pull them around. So much for the hips generating lots of force by pulling
after plant.
The back knee driving around and downwards and the front knee turning outwards
are the primary actions for generating twist.
Muscles exhibit maximum force at 1/2 their fully extended length,
i.e., you need to lengthen the muscles to maximize pulling force to not only transfer
momentum but to also actively increase the velocity by pulling against the
momentum/inertia of the hips. Once complete linkage (linkage happens through muscle and
connective tissue) happens, rotational hip momentum is transferred to the upper torso. At
this point the hips no longer transfer rotational/torsional momentum (you have coupled the
hips to the upper torso and shoulders begin to turn).
Now the hips and shoulders function as a connected unit and transfer little if
any additional rotational momentum. But the hips/legs now form a anchor for the
upper torso to pull against. At this point the torso is pulling around the imaginary rod
and OVER the hip girdle. If you subscribe to the belief that the pitcher should be in he
high cock position at foot plant, you will see the pitchers start upper body
rotation (shoulder) at this point. If they don't, the arm is in the high cock
position too long and they're dragging their arm (high cock is not a static position,
going into and coming out of, I'll save this for a later day). WHICH MEANS THE HIPS HAVE
TRANSFERRED THEIR MOMENTUM (as a result of the kinetic chain actions). Not all pitchers
rotate at the same point in their delivery with respect to foot plant. But in general a
significant potion of the lower body's rotational momentum has worked its way to he hips
prior to/at foot plant.
Now for some "heavy artillery". If you read the main web
page, youll. see that Paul has some interesting friends. The equipment Tom House
used to analyze Nolan Ryan (do computer biomechanics) was developed by Paul's track coach
(Gideon Ariel) at the University of Massachusetts and the software was developed by his
best friend (R. C. Petitto III). Paul called and asked him to do some simulation on clips
of Nolan Ryan.
Heres a computer analysis of Ryans total rotational momentum and
forward linear momentum. It shows that Ryan has achieved 85% of his total
rotational momentum AT FOOT PLANT. And that momentum does not happen instantaneously.

The Blue line is LINEAR momentum of the body and the brown is
ROTATIONAL momentum of the body.
In the pitching forum, I cite a research study ( "Characteristic ground-reaction
forces in baseball pitching", by MacWilliams, Bruce A., Choi, Tony, Perezous, Mark
K., Chao, Edmund Y.S. McFarland, Edward G. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports
Medicine, Jan-Feb 1998) that makes the following conclusions:
"The tendency of all pitchers in
the study to develop high levels of force in the direction of the pitch, combined with the
finding that pitchers who developed the largest forces (normalized to body weight) threw
fastest, seems to contradict the theory that pitching is a "controlled fall."
The pitching motion depends on significant contributions from the lower limbs to create
forward impetus. The exact contributions of each segment to the pitching motion will
require further study using a complex multi-segmental dynamic model.
Based on this study, we hypothesize
that the push-off forces in the direction of the pitch initiate the forward momentum of
the entire body. The greater this magnitude, the more kinetic energy there is in the
direction of the pitch. Similarly, the vertical push-off component (i.e.height of leg
lift, Max) can be used to generate potential energy, which can be transformed into kinetic
energy at later stages. The landing leg serves as an anchor in transforming the forward
and vertical momentum into rotational components; posteriorly directed forces at the
landing foot reflect an overall balance of the inertial forces of the body moving forward
to create ball velocities."
It is impossible to physiologically
explode. Muscles cannot instantly develop force. It takes a muscle almost two
seconds to go from zero to maximum force. That's for an individual muscle fiber.
Other factors introduce delays. Muscle fibers don't all recruit simultaneously. Connective
tissue is elastic, it stretches and then rebounds. Giving yourself a longer time to
"explode" will result in the transfer of more power as long as you maintain the
integrity of he kinetic chain (synchronization). You can "mentally" explode
(attempt to apply maximum force instantly), but physiologically it does not happen
instantly.
Now if you want to believe the hips
dont do anything until foot plant and that you only pull off of the rubber to
generate velocity and that makes you a better pitcher, I am very happy for you.
Before some of you go "ballistic", please read my first Max Speaks Out (Cues
versus Reality) and you will see why I make this statement. Many times you cannot work
on/perform parts of high speed ballistic events (muscle memory) by using the exact
description of the event. You need "cues". Cues allow you to form an internal
motor plan that gets the job done even though it may not be technically (actual
description) correct. So for learning mechanics, cues may be more effective than the
actual facts. Cues are important for teaching mechanics. The old saying, "if it ain't
broke don't fix it" applies. If you are happy with your program and getting good
results, why worry?
Training follows the 80-20 rule.
Almost any reasonably sound program will get a player 80% of the way to his goal. This is
especially true if a player has no program or bad prior instruction. Many training success
stories are he result of the "placebo" effect. The placebo effect occurs when
you believe in what you are doing. It doesn't matter if the program or equipment is no
better than what you had been doing or using previously. Because you believe it's better,
you are more dedicated you are to making it work. You are more enthused, diligent and
expend more effort. And when you improve, you give too much credit to the product or
program and not enough to your own efforts. That's why unless a program is totally wrong,
"any program is better than no program". Many training programs and products
rely on the placebo effect and would fail in a "real test". A real test uses a
control group and a test group. The control group trains like it always did. The test
group uses the new methods or equipment. The results of the control group are then
compared against he test group. Good programs get you 80% of he way without
requiring you to expend massive amounts of efforts. Again the 80-20 rule. You want 80%
there with 20% of your total training efforts because it usually takes 80% of the total
efforts to achieve the last 20% of your athletic capabilities. That's also what separates
the stars from the "wannabes".
If you are designing training
programs and equipment to measure and improve bio-mechanical pitching performance then you
must understand the whole process and work with facts. If you want to get
that last 20% of performance in the most efficient way possible, then you must understand
the whole process and work with facts. The higher your level of performance, the more
specific the training. Developing effective programs for this level of performance is
impossible without detailed understanding of the mechanics and physiology involved. If you
are trying to use the cue as an exact statement of fact and then try to use this cue to
analyze your results, you may end up "caught between a rock and a hard place".
Max
Back To Max Speaks Out Index
Back to Main Training
Page
|
|